This website is for informational purposes only. Read our Legal Disclaimer.
EUROPE Europa League
League Overview
The EUROPE Europa League standings provide a comprehensive snapshot of team performance across multiple dimensions, reflecting not only points but also tactical discipline, squad depth, and consistency over the season.
As matches accumulate, patterns emerge in both attack and defense, highlighting which clubs are able to sustain high-level performance and which struggle under pressure.
Goal difference, points per game, and head-to-head records all contribute to the broader narrative of competitiveness in the EUROPE Europa League.
External variables including match timing, squad rotation, and tactical adjustments can create significant swings in performance across multiple positions in the table.
Teams that successfully balance tactical consistency with adaptability are frequently rewarded in both points and positional movement over time.
The standings therefore act as both a performance indicator and a predictive reference for ongoing tactical and managerial decisions.
Longitudinal analysis of standings helps contextualize short-term fluctuations and identify emerging trends that may impact final positions.
Ultimately, the league overview underscores the interplay between preparation, execution, and adaptability as teams navigate a complex season.
Top of the Table
At the top of the EUROPE Europa League table, sustained performance is essential to translate early momentum into genuine title contention.
Consistency against both top-tier and lower-tier opposition can determine whether a title challenge remains viable throughout the season.
Direct encounters between title contenders often carry outsized importance, acting as six-point matches that can reshape momentum.
Teams with deeper benches are better equipped to navigate the dual pressures of domestic and international competitions.
Form, confidence, and adaptability collectively determine which teams can sustain a challenge at the top of the standings.
Top-table analysis involves not only evaluating victories but also considering the consistency and quality of performance over time.
Mid-Table Dynamics
Mid-table clubs in the EUROPE Europa League often operate in a zone of competitive equilibrium, where small sequences of wins or losses can significantly shift positions.
Consistency is more valuable than isolated peak performances, with steady accumulation of points securing stable positions.
Tactical experimentation and managerial adjustments can influence mid-table dynamics, as teams look to optimize performance without overextending resources.
Mid-table teams often serve as the bridge between title challengers and relegation-threatened clubs, balancing multiple strategic objectives.
Tracking form, goal conversion, and defensive solidity provides deeper insight into mid-table movement and potential opportunities for advancement.
Analysis of these teams highlights the interplay between consistency, resource management, and adaptability in a competitive league.
Relegation Battle
The lower end of the EUROPE Europa League table is defined by high-pressure matches where every point is critical for survival.
Small mistakes or lapses in concentration can have outsized consequences, making consistency vital in avoiding the drop.
Direct encounters between relegation-threatened clubs are often decisive, sometimes functioning as six-point battles that dramatically alter survival prospects.
Teams with larger rosters or flexible tactical approaches are better positioned to handle the pressures of survival.
Late-season matches against stronger opposition provide crucial tests of mental fortitude and tactical discipline.
Monitoring incremental gains and maintaining discipline often determines which clubs survive and which face demotion.
Disclaimer
This EUROPE Europa League standings analysis is automatically generated using historical league structures, fixture trends, and long-term performance metrics. It is intended strictly for informational and educational purposes and does not constitute professional advice, betting guidance, or predictive analytics.Standings
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Diff | Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aston Villa | 12 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 24 | 9 | 15 | 33 |
| 2 | Freiburg | 12 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 26 |
| 3 | FC Porto | 12 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 19 | 10 | 9 | 25 |
| 4 | Bologna | 14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 24 | 18 | 6 | 25 |
| 5 | Braga | 12 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 24 |
| 6 | Genk | 12 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 19 | 16 | 3 | 23 |
| 7 | Lyon | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 22 |
| 8 | Nottingham | 14 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 23 | 13 | 10 | 22 |
| 9 | Midtjylland | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 22 |
| 10 | Betis | 12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 13 | 7 | 21 |
| 11 | Ferencvaros | 12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 21 |
| 12 | Celta Vigo | 13 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 20 | 19 | 1 | 20 |
| 13 | Panathinaikos | 12 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 19 |
| 14 | Stuttgart | 12 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 20 | 15 | 5 | 18 |
| 15 | AS Roma | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 17 | 11 | 6 | 17 |
| 16 | Crvena zvezda | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 17 |
| 17 | Braga (Por) | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 16 |
| 18 | Midtjylland (Den) | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 3 | 11 | 16 |
| 19 | Utrecht (Ned) | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 16 |
| 20 | Lille | 12 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 15 |
| 21 | Fenerbahce | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 15 |
| 22 | Celtic | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 15 | 19 | -4 | 14 |
| 23 | Legia (Pol) | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 13 |
| 24 | Ludogorets | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 14 | 18 | -4 | 13 |
| 25 | PAOK | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 18 | 17 | 1 | 12 |
| 26 | Plzen | 10 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | Shakhtar Donetsk (Ukr) | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 11 |
| 28 | AEK Larnaca (Cyp) | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 11 |
| 29 | Din Zagreb | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 16 | 22 | -6 | 11 |
| 30 | FCSB (Rou) | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 10 |
| 31 | Hacken (Swe) | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 10 |
| 32 | Brann (Nor) | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
| 33 | Maccabi Tel Aviv (Isr) | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
| 34 | Brann | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 9 |
| 35 | Young Boys | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 9 |
| 36 | Panathinaikos (Gre) | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 |
| 37 | CFR Cluj (Rou) | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 8 |
| 38 | PAOK (Gre) | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
| 39 | Sturm Graz | 8 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 7 |
| 40 | FCSB | 8 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 16 | -7 | 7 |
| 41 | GA Eagles | 8 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 14 | -8 | 7 |
| 42 | Malmo FF (Swe) | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| 43 | Young Boys (Sui) | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
| 44 | Rijeka (Cro) | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 8 | -3 | 6 |
| 45 | Feyenoord | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 11 | 15 | -4 | 6 |
| 46 | Basel | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 6 |
| 47 | KuPS (Fin) | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 6 |
| 48 | Salzburg | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 6 |
| 49 | Celje (Slo) | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 5 |
| 50 | Levski Sofia (Bul) | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| 51 | Zrinjski (Bih) | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 5 |
| 52 | Malmo FF | 8 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 4 |
| 53 | Lincoln Red Imps (Gib) | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 10 | -7 | 4 |
| 54 | Rangers | 8 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 14 | -9 | 4 |
| 55 | Genk (Bel) | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| 56 | Ludogorets (Bul) | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
| 57 | Shelbourne (Irl) | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 3 |
| 58 | Anderlecht (Bel) | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 59 | Dyn Kyiv (Ukr) | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 3 |
| 60 | Sheriff Tiraspol (Mda) | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 3 |
| 61 | Shkendija (Mkd) | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 3 |
| 62 | Lech Poznan (Pol) | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 3 |
| 63 | Prishtina (Kos) | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 3 |
| 64 | Nice | 8 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 7 | 15 | -8 | 3 |
| 65 | Sabah Baku (Aze) | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 1 |
| 66 | Ostrava (Cze) | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 1 |
| 67 | Hibernian (Sco) | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 68 | Breidablik (Ice) | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 69 | Partizan (Srb) | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 70 | Trnava (Svk) | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | -1 | 1 |
| 71 | H Beer Sheva (Isr) | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 1 |
| 72 | Noah (Arm) | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 1 |
| 73 | Samsunspor (Tur) | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 1 |
| 74 | Lugano (Sui) | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 1 |
| 75 | Wolfsberger AC (Aut) | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 1 |
| 76 | Aberdeen (Sco) | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 1 |
| 77 | Paks (Hun) | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 1 |
| 78 | Ilves (Fin) | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | -6 | 1 |
| 79 | Utrecht | 8 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 15 | -10 | 1 |
| 80 | Maccabi Tel Aviv | 8 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 22 | -20 | 1 |
| 81 | Slovan Bratislava (Svk) | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 0 |
| 82 | RFS (Lat) | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 0 |
| 83 | Aktobe (Kaz) | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 84 | Drita (Kos) | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 0 |
| 85 | Servette (Sui) | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 0 |
| 86 | Hamrun (Mlt) | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 0 |
| 87 | Besiktas (Tur) | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | -4 | 0 |
| 88 | Fredrikstad (Nor) | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 0 |
| 89 | Sigma Olomouc (Cze) | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 |